Prediction of functional outcome after spinal cord injury: a task for the rehabilitation team and the patient

Study design: Descriptive analysis of data gathered in an information system.Objectives: To explore the predictions of professionals and patients regarding functional outcome after spinal cord injury related to the final results after inpatient rehabilitation, in order to make prognostics of rehabilitation outcome more successful and enlarge the role of the patient in selecting realistic rehabilitation goals.Methods: Data from 55 patients with spinal cord injury admitted to the rehabilitation centre. Expectations of the rehabilitation team and the patients regarding future independence in performing six daily activities were compared to the functional results at discharge. The results of patients with different level and extent of lesion were analyzed.Results: In 52% of all performed skills, independence was achieved at discharge. Professionals and patients made similar predictions. If they both expected independence after rehabilitation, 90% of the skills were performed independently at discharge. If they both did not expect independence only 3% of the functional results were positive. Of all combined predictions 64% was correct. Correct predictions were most often found regarding self-care skills of patients with paraplegia and regarding mobility of patients with complete lesions. Prediction of self-care outcome of patients with tetraplegia is far more complicated. There was a considerable variation in predictions of mobility potential, especially regarding patients with incomplete lesions. If the team and patients agreed upon expected independence in mobility skills of these patients, the final results were mostly positive.Conclusions: Prediction of functional outcome after spinal cord injury was most successful if the expectations of the team and patients were combined. Prognosis of self-care outcome of patients with paraplegia and mobility potential of patients with complete spinal cord lesions was usually clear at admission. However, selection of realistic goals concerning self-care skills of patients with tetraplegia and mobility skills of patients with incomplete lesions is far more complicated. Gradual adjustment of objectives is needed during the rehabilitation process in close collaboration between the professionals and the patients

Employment status, job characteristics and work-related health experience of people with a lower limb amputation in the Netherlands

Objectives: To describe the occupational situation of people with lower limb amputations in The Netherlands and to compare the health experience of workings and nonworking amputee patients with a nonimpaired reference population. Design: Cross-sectional study in which patients completed a questionnaire about their job participation. type of job, workplace adjustments to their limb loss, their position in the company, and a general health questionnaire. Setting: Orthopsdic workshops in The Netherlands with a population of lower limb amputees. Patients: Subjects were recruited from orthopedic workshops in the Netherlands. They ranged in age from Is to 60 years (mean, 44.5yr) and had a lower limb amputated at least 2 years (mean, 19.6yr) before this study. Main Outcome measures: A self-report questionnaire, with 1 part concerning patient characteristics and amputation-related factors, and the other concerning job characteristics, vocational handicaps, work adjustments, and working conditions; and a general health questionnaire (RAND-36) to measure health status. Results: Responses were received from 652 of the 687 patients (response: rate, 95%) who were sent the questionnaire. Sixty-foul percent of the respondents were working at the rime of the study (comparable with the employment rate of the general Dutch population), 31 % had work experience but were not presently working, and 5% had no work experience. After their amputations, people shifted to less physically demanding work. The mean delay between the amputation and the return to work was 2.3 years. Many people wished their work was better adjusted to the limitations presented by their disability and they mentioned having problems concerning possibilities fur promotion. Seventy-eight percent of those who stopped working within 2 years after the amputation said that amputation-related factors played a role in their decision. Thirty-four percent said that they might have worked longer if certain adjustments had been made. The health experience of people who were no longer working was significantly worse than that of the working people with amputations. Conclusions: Although amputee patients had a relatively good rate of job participation, they reported problems concerning the long delay between amputation and return to work, problems in finding suitable jobs, fewer possibilities for promotion, and problems in obtaining needed workplace modifications. People who had to stop working because of the amputation showed a worse health experience than working people

Long-term physical, psychological and social consequences of a fracture of the ankle

The long-term physical, psychological and social outcomes of 68 patients with an ankle fracture were investigated by using a postal questionnaire 6 years after injury. Patients were treated at a level I Trauma Centre between January 1989 and December 1989. Where applicable, the outcomes were compared with the outcomes of severely injured patients who were investigated previously. Physically, the patients were suffering from problems in the extremities and the spine. Surprisingly, half of them (52 per cent) had psychological complaints due to the initial injury. Eighty-nine per cent of the patients returned to work. This result seems to be only slightly better than the return to work in severely injured patients (74 per cent). Those with an ankle fracture needed less time to return to work (3 months versus 13 months in the severely injured patients). Further social changes (marital status, leisure activities) were mostly found in the severely injured patients. Patients with an ankle fracture as well as severely injured patients are affected by long-term consequences. The differences between the two groups are not as pronounced as is generally assumed. Probably, the consequences of lesser injuries are frequently disregarded, whereas severely injured patients are doing better than expected